|
advantageconsumer.com Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
advantageconsumer.com Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
Banking
1. Banks have a right to liquidate the debt of a customer through adjustment of his accounts National
Commission, New Delhi Branch Manager, Union Bank of India and Anr.
2. Bank directed to compensate for ornaments lost from the locker. First Appeal No.7 of 1991 Punjab
National Bank, Bombay. ...
Appellant 3. Bank should provide a hassle free access to the holder of the locker to operate the same. Revision Petition No. 853 OF 2004 A.S.Arunachalam
.. Petitioner 4.If the signature on the cheque is not genuine, then there is no mandate on the part of bank to pay and there would be no question of any negligence on the part of the customer, such as carelessly leaving the cheque book. National Commission, New Delhi N. Venkanna
---- Petitioner 5. Ensuring safety of the money to be deposited by a customer inside the bank premises is part of service rendered by a bank to a customer. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI Col. D.S. Sachar (Retd.)
........ Petitioner 6. Bank penalised for
inconsistent procedural lapses
MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA & 2 ORS. ...........Appellant(s) Versus NARINDER KUMAR JAIN ...........Respondent(s) 7. ICICI Bank penalised for delayed handing over of mortgaged documents HARI KUMAR RAJU ...........Petitioner(s) Versus MD, ICICI BANK LTD & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 8. HDFC Bank penalised for not adhering to due process of law for repossession and auction of mortgaged vehicle. Versus RAMBIR SINGH ...........Respondent(s) 9. Bank has a general lien over amounts deposited by the customer and has a right to recover any due from the customer. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELH
REVISION PETITION
NO. 1580 OF 2015
Branch Manager, State Bank of India ...........Petitioner(s) Versus PADMAKAR MIRAJKAR ...........Respondent(s) 10. Bank directed to compensate
the consumer for making payments on wrong signatures
NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
R. UDAYASANKER ...........Petitioner(s) Versus Chief Manager, Central Bank of India, Pondicherry ...........Respondent(s) 11. Bank directed
to compensate the customer for fraudulent withdrawals made from his account.
NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
STATE BANK OF INDIA ...........Petitioner(s) Versus GAURAV GUPTA ...........Respondent(s) 12. Bank penalised for not taking adequate interest
to detect fraudulent ATM withdrawals.
T.N. RAVI PRAKASH ...........Petitioner(s) Versus MANAGER, STATE BANK OF MYSORE ...........Respondent(s) 13. Bank penalised for enforcing a defective Agreement and whimsically adjusting the pension amount against the loan. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL
BANK ....Petitioner(s)
Versus SACHINANDAN SAMANTA ..........Respondent(s) 14. Bank penalised for not returning the bounced cheque to the customer. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
RAGHUBIR SINGH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 15. Bank penalised for enforcing a defective Agreement and whimsically adjusting the pension amount against the loan. BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL
BANK
...........Petitioner(s) Versus SACHINANDAN SAMANTA ...........Respondent(s) Top |
|
|