|
advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
Housing 1. Housing Board directed to compensate
National Commission, New Delhi The Secretary
-cum-chief Engineer, H.P. Housing Board 2. Compensation awarded against defective workmanship upheld National
Commission, New Delhi Delhi Development
Authority 3. Housing board directed to provide alternate plot National
commission, New Delhi The Tamil
Nadu Housing board Anr. 4. BDA directed to compensate National
Commission, New Delhi B.N.Venkatesh
Murthy 5. Ghaziabad development authority penalised National
Commission, New Delhi S.K. Singhal
6. Development Authority directed to pay compensation National
Commission, New Delhi Sanjay
Nagar Welfare Assn. 7. Relief ordered for house allottees National
Commission, New Delhi The General
Consumer Protection Welfare,Association and Ors.
8. Builder directed to pay interest for delayed completion National
Commission, New Delhi P.Muthusway,Chief
Executive, 9. Bihar State Housing Board penalised for unilaterally cancelling allotted house. National Commission,
New Delhi
10. Opposite Party cannot be authorised to decide the complaint NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela, Etc.
..... Appellants 11. Builder directed to refund the deposit along with penal interest and compensation, for not delivering the commercial premises in time NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
M/s. Rajendra Properties & Industries
- Petitioner 12. "For delayed handing over of possession of houses, beyond two years from the date of deposit of the amount, the Development Authority shall pay interest on the deposit" National Commission,
New Delhi Ghaziabad Development Authority
---- Petitioner 13. "For delayed handing over of possession of houses, beyond two years from the date of deposit of the amount, the Development Authority shall pay interest on the deposit" National Commission,
New Delhi Haryana Urban Development Authority
... Petitioner 14. Consumer has to obtain all the details before signing the agreement. Otherwise he will have to suffer for making any wrong assumption. National Commission,
New Delhi Smt. Kamini Gupta & Ors.
-- Petitioners 15. Offering of possession of an incomplete house is no offer. National Commission,
New Delhi Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela
-- Appellant 16. GDA directed to pay 15% interest for the delay in handing over of the flat and it should recover this amount from the officers responsible for this delay. National Commission, New Delhi Ram Kishore Tiwari
.. Petitioner 17. Anyone booking more than one residential flat
is not deemed to be a consumer
Indrajit Dutta ...Appellant/Complainant Versus Samriddhi Developers Pvt. Ltd. …Respondents/Opposite Parties 18. Builder penalised for delayed delivery 1. M/S. SAS REALTORS (P) LTD. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus R. RAJAGOPALAN ...........Respondent(s) 19. Jalandhar Improvement Trust penalised
for harassing the plot applicant
Versus SARWAN SINGH ...........Respondent(s) 20. Interesting distinction made between a joint-venture agreement,
and an agreement for construction of residential building and to deliver
agreed area to the land owners
M. VITTAL RAO (DIED) REP. BY LRS. ...........Appellant(s) Versus M/S. BRINDAVAN BUILDERS PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) 21. Builder penalised for not handing over possession of the flat. HARSHAD JAIN & ANR.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus M/S. UNITECH LIMITED ...........Opp.Party(s) 22. Builder penalised for delayed delivery. M/S. SAS REALTORS (P) LTD.
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus R. RAJAGOPALAN ...........Respondent(s) 23. Builder directed to refund the amount along with penal interest, for inordinate delay in handing over possession. HARISH CHAWLA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus PURI CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LTD. & ANR. ........Opp.Party(s) Top |
|
|