advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela
  about us
informationmanagementservices
Important judgements passed by the Consumer Courts



1. Life Insurance Corporation directed to compensate

   National Commission, New Delhi
First Appeal no. 30 of 1991

Smt.Manjulaben V.Parmar and Anr. 
Vs
L.I.C of india and Anr.



2. Agents not authorised to collect any money on behalf of LIC.

National commission,New Delhi
First Appeal no.280 of 1992

Life insurance corpn.of india and Anr 
Vs
Consumer Education and Research Society and Ors.



3. Nominee of the insured cannot be penalised for the employer's fault

National Commission, New Delhi
First appeal no. 242 of 1992

Union of India ,Through:Deputy Chief Engineer,Southern Railway 
Vs
Smt.Rajeswari and Ors.



4. Mere receipt of premium shall not bind LIC

National Commission, Camp Office: Bangalore
Revision Petition No.533 of 1994

L.I.C. of India  and Anr.
Vs 
Smt. K.Aruna Kumari



5. An applicant not fulfilling the conditions specified cannot accuse LIC of rendering deficient service

National Commission, New Delhi
Revision Petition No.701 of 1996

LIC of India and Others 
Vs 
Ms.Kanchan Murlidhar Akkalwar



6. Commission defines accidental death and directs LIC to pay insurance benefits

National Commission, New Delhi
Revision Petition No. 536 of 1996

Smt. Manda Savarna
Vs.
Branch Manager LIC of  India & Another


7.LIC directed to pay accident benefit to the victim who suffered total permanent disability of both legs

NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
REVISION PETITION NO. 436 OF 1996

Bhag Chand Jain                               - Petitioner 
Vs. 
LIC of India & Anr.                          - Respondents


8.  LIC cannot repudiate a claim, when there is no nexus between the ailment suppressed and the ailment for which claim is made.

National Commission, New Delhi
Revision Petition No. 82 of 2000

Ramakrishna Manjkrao Pusadkar       --- Petitioner
                 Vs.
L.I.C. of India                                    --- Respondent



9. Parties to an agreement are not entitled to get benefits of apparent mistakes. 

National Commission, New Delhi
Original Petition No. 178 of 1995

Satya Deo Malviya                               -- Complainant
                              Vs.
Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd.   -- Opposite Party



                                                                                             Top
 
feedback query
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela