|
advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela |
|
|
|
Life Insurance
1. Life Insurance Corporation directed to compensate
National Commission, New Delhi Smt.Manjulaben
V.Parmar and Anr. 2. Agents not authorised to collect any money on behalf of LIC. National
commission,New Delhi Life insurance
corpn.of india and Anr 3. Nominee of the insured cannot be penalised for the employer's fault National Commission, New Delhi Union of India ,Through:Deputy Chief Engineer,Southern Railway
4. Mere receipt of premium shall not bind LIC National
Commission, Camp Office: Bangalore L.I.C. of India and Anr. 5. An applicant not fulfilling the conditions specified cannot accuse LIC of rendering deficient service National
Commission, New Delhi LIC of India and Others 6. Commission defines accidental death and directs LIC to pay insurance benefits National Commission, New Delhi Smt. Manda Savarna 7.LIC directed to pay accident benefit to the victim who suffered total permanent disability of both legs NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Bhag Chand Jain
- Petitioner 8. LIC cannot repudiate a claim, when there is no nexus between the ailment suppressed and the ailment for which claim is made. National Commission,
New Delhi Ramakrishna Manjkrao Pusadkar
--- Petitioner 9. Parties to an agreement are not entitled to get benefits of apparent mistakes. National Commission, New Delhi
Satya Deo Malviya
-- Complainant 10. Life Insurance is a contract on good faith.
Nominees of a Policy stand to be penalised for hiding of vital information
by the Policyholder.
LIC OF INDIA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus RAMAMANI PATRA & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 11. Insurance benefits denied as the insured had concealed
material fact at the time of obtaining the Insurance Policy.
SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus DUNE BHAGYALAKSHMI ...........Respondent(s) 12. Claim cannot be repudiated on the basis of
non-disclosure of existing policies for covering the same risk.
IDBI FEDERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Petitioner(s) Versus RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAIN ...........Respondent(s) 13. LIC’s refusal to pay double accident benefits upheld, as the vehicle was being driven in contravention of the MV Act. BHANUBEN VALJIBHAI ...........Petitioner(s) Versus LIC OF INDIA ...........Respondent(s) 14. In the case of premium being remitted
through Salary deduction, LIC and the Employer have the responsibility to
inform the individual, in case of default. Else, they have to make
good the loss suffered.
Versus SEETA & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 15. LIC’s Petition for relief dismissed at admission stage itself, for claiming inherent typographical error in the sum assured of the Policy NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
OF INDIA & ANR.
...........Petitioner(s) Versus PARVATI BAI & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) 16. A contract of insurance involves utmost good faith. Since the insured had concealed material facts, LIC’s appeal upheld and the death claim disallowed. NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI
REVISION PETITION
NOs. 1949 – 1952 OF 2018
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus RAJ VILAS DONGRE & ANR. ...........Respondent(s) Top |
|
|