advantageconsumer.com
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela
  about us
informationmanagementservices
Important judgements passed by the Consumer Courts

1. Automobile Dealer penalised for rendering deficient service to a self-employed youth.

National Commission, New Delhi
First Appeal No. 95 of 1990

K. Haridasan
Vs.
M/s M.O. Hasan Kuthoos, Maricar Pvt. Ltd.


2. Non refunding of booking advance amounts to deficiency in service.

National Commission ,New Delhi
Original Petition no.29 of 1990

Consumer Protection Council,Rourkela 
Vs
M/s.Andhra Pradesh Scooters Ltd.


3. Non refunding of booking advance amounts to deficiency in service.

NATIONAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Original Petition Nos. 15 & 30 of 1990

Mumbai Grahak Panchayat & CPC, Rourkela
Vs.
M/s Lohia Machines Ltd., Kanpur


4. Maruti Udyog penalised for delayed delivery of vehicle

National Commission, New Delhi
First appeal No.576 of 1992

M/s Maruti Udyog ltd. 
Vs 
Dr. Bhavna Chunnubhai Shah and Ors.

5. If there is a defect in the product and if it is not rectified during the warranty period, then it has to be replaced

State Commission, Orissa, Cuttack
CD APPEAL NO. 250 OF 1998, DECIDED ON 19-6-2001

Bajaj Auto Limited & Another              ---    Appellants
Vs.
Sri A. Nageswar Rao & Another           ---    Respondents

6. Misleading advertisement, an Unfair trade practice. Claim of 80 kms. per liter of petrol under standard conditions not intelligible to a layman.

National Commission, New Delhi
Revision Petition No. 831 of 2001

M.R. Ramesh                                        ..    Petitioner 
                 Vs. 
M/s. Prakash Moped House & Ors.          ..   Respondents


                                                                                          TOP
 
feedback query
Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela